Ode on a Grecian Urn and Ode to a Nightingale analysis. Both by John Keats

Ode on a Hellenic Urn and to a Nightingale Ode on a Grecian Urn draws out cardinal distinguishable emotions. Firstly, happiness is gaunt out, mostly due to the incident that Keats uses the word happy so many times. Upon interpreting the verse again I reflect hints of sadness when examining the urn. The beginning of the meter is one of happiness and wonderment as Keats asks what men or gods be these, referring to the figures on the posture of the urn. Keats seems intrigued by the beauty of the urn and how everything on the urn whitethorn fade simply is ceaselessly imprinted on the side. But when reading the poem over I see a different side of the poem. I opine that Keats is second guessing the compassion of beingness unendingized on the urn. The eternally figures on the urn are fair a tragic monitor of glorious times passed that may never be seen again. As in lines 36-40 in which Keats states that citadels are emptied of people, streets are empty and quiet and no one tender ever return. Another lower setback of the amaranthineity of the urn is its repetition. Being imprinted with keystone on the side of the urn in paint gives no brio to the figures. They are trapped in the position for all eternity with no capabilities.

Who would want an immortal vitality with the curse of being trapped when one could sustenance a mortal life full of free will, and pull out making? Line 17 speaks of a lover who posterior not kiss his companion because he is stuck in position. Ode to a Nightingale is a high-risk poem to read. Keats is somehow mown by the song that gives him pleasure. Keats may be jealous of the nightingale, mayhap of the simplicity of... If you want to quiver a full essay, contract it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper