'Cultural Diplomacy: a Filipino Perspective Essay\r'

'I. WHAT IS CULTURAL prudence?\r\nConsidered as a relatively new depot in inter matter relations and among governments, a ordinarily cited definition of pagan diplomacy is that of Milton Cummings, an American semipolitical Scientist which defines Cultural slightness as â€Å"the exchange of ideas, information, values, systems, traditions, beliefs, and early(a) aspects of gardening, with the intention of fostering mutual understanding” mingled with or among nations (Kang, 2013) or simply put, it pertains to a heathen form of external communication between and/or among nations (Kieldanowicz). It was only during the past decade when governments started to and have increasingly paid attention to the practice of Cultural Diplomacy and have acknowledged the growing importance of heathenish dimensions in analyzing the ever-increasing complexity of foreign affairs (Kang, 2013).\r\n imposture and culture are both important aspects of heathenish diplomacy, as these are the forefront of many countries’ promotional efforts. The showcasing of a country’s ethnic heritage, as made possible by cultural diplomacy, provides a country with the opportunity of showing who they are and fix a positive image which will dish them achieve their political aims (Kieldanowicz).\r\nThis belief was echoed by Filipino DFA Secretary Albert del Rosario was quoted saying â€Å"DFA recognizes the impact of culture in modern diplomacy and sees it as an effective spear in protecting our national interest, in pass on our advocacies and in achieving the development agenda of the country in the international arena. Cultural diplomacy is described as â€Å"…a course of actions, which are based on and utilize the exchange of ideas, values, traditions and other aspects of culture or personal personal identity, whether to strengthen relationships, enhance socio-cultural cooperation or promote national interests; Cultural diplomacy can be upright by eithe r the public arena, private sector or civil society.” From this definition, we can gather that cultural diplomacy is similar to an disciplinement between two countries for the purpose of strengthening their relations through their cultures.\r\nII. Philippine ISSUES IN LINE WITH CULTURAL DIPLOMACY\r\nThe prime(prenominal) aftermath which the group considers significant in canal with the establishment of cultural diplomacy is the issue tribe’s patronization of Korean, Japanese and American pop culture. As previously menti bingled, art and culture withstands up our identity as Filipinos, however with the continuous and increasing â€Å"Japanesation, Koreanisation and Americanization” of our young generation, the young population is slowly losing its Filipino identity this then becomes a hindrance to the promotion of local anesthetic anesthetic Philippine culture, so the question is how could the Philippine local culture be promoted abroad if locally, t pre sent is hindrance in promoting, much less preserving it.\r\nIII. PROJECTION OF ISSUES ON FOREIGN POLICY\r\nThe ‘Japanesation’, ‘Koreanisation’ and ‘Westernization’ of the Filipino pop culture must be squall by the Philippine government. We believe however, that action must first be taken in the local or house servant level and extend it later on to the international level by virtue of foreign policy. In line with this issue the government may patron students to study sociology with focus on Philippine culture, or establish art competitions such as song-writing and icon contests and the like. This will later on be reflected in the foreign policy by the establishment of government sponsorship of foreign students studying of Philippine culture and society.\r\nAs we know, globalization is defined as â€Å"worldwide integrating and development” and it has helped in improving the economy of dissimilar countries. Nowadays, there is a pos it for all the countries need to improve their exports to be able to make it in the international market. But despite that, globalization has withal caused problems such as in cultural diplomacy, an archetype of this is the Business Process Outsourcing Industry. Even though the relent is nice in such an industry, there is an issue concerning cultural meetinges. Since most of the BPOs came from the western side of the priming coat and then merely outsourced, there is a clash of what are the ways of living in one certain country and the ways of doing things when brought to the receiving country. in that respect would be a lot of issues that would need to be addressed which causes in problems in cultural diplomacy.\r\nLet’s use the call burden business as an example. Let’s us say that there is a new call center has been outsourced here in the Philippines. In the country where the call center originated they do no not celebrate Christmas or Lent but here in the Phil ippines we do celebrate these events. This is where the clash begins, because these are two various countries with two different cultures, it would be hard to make or form a cultural diplomacy. There is a need to have talks to address such issues and so that both parties can agree on decide on something to agree on to form a partnership through cultural diplomacy.\r\n'