Did the Arabs Injustice Huntington?

Samuel Huntington is the author of the article entitled The Clash of Civilizations? which dissertatees or narrates concepts that explicates founding politics. According to Huntington, international conflicts that concerns politics may be confirm by rational arguments or issues that argon left unresolved. However, Huntington reiterates that these particular conflicts argon founded on underlying issues or matters that naturally lead to political conflicts that is polish.According to Huntington, culture is threatening to divide nations instead of leading the way to support genius and oneness in handling international problems or issues, since culture is the first-string source of irreconcilable differences and conflicts that do non provide opportunities for nations to meet in middle ground. As a flirt withs of re re feeding concrete structures of culture, Huntingon has labeled heptad civilizations being the Confucian, Hindu, Islamic, Japanese, Latin American, Slavic-Orthodox, and westerly. One may nonice that Huntington left off the African populace as one of the identified civilizations.This is because Huntington was unsure well-nigh the state of the African nation, that is, whether it meets the standards and guidelines of development that is attributed to a mindful and responsive civilization. The miscellany of Huntington of the world population into civilizations was primary influenced by prominent spiritual affiliations that are a major identifier of culture. Personally, I would have to agree with Huntington on this matter, since I sincerely entrust that cultural affiliations among individuals are largely influenced by the religious beliefs that they share.Huntington believes that the strong ties of individuals to their culture and devotion which grants them a sense of self or identity as an individual and as a nation, is difficult to draw apart when it comes to promoting rational politics and relations that necessitates the disregard of per sonal worldviews as directed by a civilizations culture. However, Huntingtons organisation of seven civilizations has also been a source of contradicting information that he has presented in his article since the classification of civilizations is complicated and inconsistent.Moreover, Huntington mentioned that differences mingled with people, as supported by his theory of the seven civilizations in the world, do non necessarily beggarly that there will be conflict, and conflict does not necessarily mean that it will lead to rage. However, the gist of Huntingtons article clearly displays how differences, particularly in culture and religion, is the primary cause of conflict and violence almost the world as he studied the Cold War and the succeed world events after it.These contradicting thoughts that Huntington shared in his work, he also contradicted by stating how culture and religion are two important factors in promoting unity. In this case, Huntington mentioned how non-A rab Muslims were able to unite as one despite differences of culture and religion and through shared culture and religion. Upon the establishment of the seven civilizations, Huntington continued to discuss various historical evidences that support his claim. This particular issue led to the news of the politics between the Arabs and the westernmost which raised violent reactions from the former.Huntington wrote that at present time, the major players in world politics are the West and the Arab nation. scorn internal clashes between different factions or minority groups within the Arab nations, Huntington believes that in the end, it will still find a way to reconcile differences among them and be counter-reactive to the West. Although the statements of Huntington caused a stir within the Arab nation, I believe that Huntington was not military press violent, hateful, derogatory, or discriminatory issues against the Arab nation.Huntington magnified his discussion on the issue betw een the Arabs and the West since it is the current international issue or problem the force out struggle between the two civilizations which people often hear in the news. Although majority of Huntingtons arguments were found on theories, I believe that everything he said were reflective of the current situations, straying away from the assumption that he wrote the article to present his prejudiced or biased sentiments against the Arab nation.His article was based on decades of historical evidences that created an obvious pattern relaying motivations of war in the past, which was advertise supported by the 9/11 incident that led to the remnant of the Twin Towers in New York. Huntington was simply observant and articulates enough to present a logical explanation of countless conflicts between nations, which may or may not have some truth to it. Frankly, I believe that major truths are embedded within theories, especially those that lend themselves to conspirative issues.Setting my personal opinions aside, Huntingtons criticisms of other civilization validates the fact that he was not anti-Arab, but simple a man who wanted to illustrate world politics under a cultural context. Huntington bumpd the immorality and hypocrisy of the West, stating how the western civilization has achieved its passingiority over other civilizations due to its mindful incoming to organized violence in order to achieve its goals and objectives. Moreover, Huntington reiterates that the West does not promote universalism but rather act for world domination.Moreover, Huntington believes that Christian views which originated from the West could not have influenced numerous people around the world if Christians had not come into contact with individuals from the East. Huntington then criticized Western Christianity and then continued to criticize Western Europe. According to Huntington, some of the concepts of politics and economics claimed by the Western Civilization, particularly W estern Europe, did not actually originate from it but from non-Western civilizations in other parts of the world.In general, Huntingtons article was a seemingly equilibrise representation of his theories on how international conflicts, then and now, were products of cultural and religious differences. The criticisms he posed were not one-sided, attacking the Middle East or the West, or any other civilization for that matter, solely. In fact, Huntingtons theories were open discussions and arguments most the Arab and Western perspectives. Huntington acknowledged how the West is attempt to portray a super power estate that works to promote unity, solidarity, democracy, diplomacy, peace, and such.This, he identified as the Western perspective. However, Huntington argued that the Wests interests are politically motivated, geared toward staying in power and obtaining control of the majority populations. On one hand, Huntington discussed how the Arab populations are trying to overthrow the influence of the West in their land, moving them to resort to threats and violence toward non-Arab and Western nations. For Huntington, the Arab perspective is just patterned after the us-versus-them mentality.